This white paper has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the Commission Implementing Regulation 2024/2984 of 29 November 2024 implementing technical standards for the application of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to forms, formats and templates for the crypto-asset White Paper
MAGIC EDEN ($ME) TOKEN WHITE PAPER
This crypto-asset white paper has not been approved by any competent authority in any Member State of the European Union. The person seeking admission to trading of the crypto-asset is solely responsible for the content of this crypto-asset white paper.
|
No |
FIELD |
CONTENT TO BE REPORTED |
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
00 |
Table of contents |
SUMMARY Part A - Information about the offeror or the person seeking admission
to trading A.1 Name A.2 Legal Form A.3 Registered address A.4 Head office A.5 Registration date A.6 Legal entity identifier A.7 Another identifier required
pursuant to applicable national law A.8 Contact telephone number A.9 E-mail address A.10 Response time (Days) A.11 Parent company A.12 Members of the management
body A.13 Business Activity A.14 Parent company business
activity A.15 Newly established A.16 Financial condition for the
past three years A.17 Financial condition since
registration Part B - Information about the issuer, if different from the offeror
or person seeking admission to trading Not
applicable Part C - Information about the operator of the trading platform in
cases where it draws up the crypto-asset white paper and information about
other persons Not applicable Part D - Information about the crypto-asset project D.1 Crypto-asset project name D.2 Crypto-assets name D.3 Abbreviation D.4 Crypto-asset project
description D.5 Details of all natural or
legal persons involved in the implementation of the crypto-asset project D.6 Utility Token Classification D.7 Key Features of
Goods/Services for Utility Token Projects D.8 Plans for the token D.9 Resource Allocation D.10 Planned use of Collected
funds or crypto-Assets Part E - Information about the offer to the public of crypto-assets or
their admission to trading E.1 Public offering or admission
to trading E.2 Reasons for public offer or
admission to trading E.3 Fundraising target E.4 Minimum subscription goals E.5 Maximum subscription goals E.6 Oversubscription acceptance E.7 Oversubscription allocation E.8 Issue price E.9 Official currency or any
other crypto-assets determining the issue price E.10 Subscription fee E.11 Offer price determination
method E.12 Total number of
offered/traded crypto-assets E.13 Targeted holders E.14 Holder restrictions E.15 Reimbursement notice E.16 Refund mechanism E.17 Refund timeline E.18 Offer phases E.19 Early purchase discount E.20 Time-limited offer E.21 Subscription period
beginning E.22 Subscription period end E.23 Safeguarding arrangements
for offered funds/crypto-Assets E.24 Payment methods for
crypto-asset purchase E.25 Value transfer methods for
reimbursement E.26 Right of withdrawal E.27 Transfer of purchased
crypto-assets E.28 Transfer time schedule E.29 Purchaser's technical
requirements E.30 Crypto-asset service
provider (CASP) name E.31 CASP identifier E.32 Placement form E.33 Trading platforms name E.34 Trading platforms Market
identifier code (MIC) E.35 Trading platforms access E.36 Involved costs E.37 Offer expenses E.38 Conflicts of interest E.39 Applicable law E.40 Competent court Part F - Information about the crypto-assets F.1 Crypto-asset type F.2 Crypto-asset functionality F.3 Planned application of
functionalities F.4 Type of crypto-asset white
paper F.5 The type of submission F.6 Crypto-asset characteristics F.7 Commercial name or trading
name F.8 Website of the issuer F.9 Starting date of offer to the
public or admission to trading F.10 Publication date F.11 Any other services provided
by the issuer F.12 Language or languages of the
crypto-asset white paper F.13 Digital token identifier
code used to uniquely identify the crypto-asset or each of the several crypto
assets to which the white paper relates, where available F.14 Functionally fungible group
digital token identifier, where available F.15 Voluntary data flag F.16 Personal data flag F.17 LEI eligibility F.18 Home Member State F.19 Host Member State Part G - Information on the rights and obligations attached to the
crypto-assets G.1 Purchaser rights and
obligations G.2 Exercise of rights and
obligations G.3 Conditions for modifications
of rights and obligations G.4 Future public offers G.5 Issuer retained crypto-assets G.6 Utility token classification G.7 Key features of
goods/services of utility tokens G.8 Utility tokens redemption G.9 Non-trading request G.10 Crypto-assets purchase or
sale modalities G.11 Crypto-assets transfer
restrictions G.12 Supply adjustment protocols G.13 Supply adjustment mechanisms G.14 Token value protection
schemes G.15 Token value protection
schemes description G.16 Compensation schemes G.17 Compensation schemes
description G.18 Applicable law G.19 Competent court Part H – Information on the underlying technology H.1 Distributed ledger technology
(DLT) H.2 Protocols and technical
standards H.3 Technology used H.4 Consensus mechanism H.5 Incentive mechanisms and
applicable fees H.6 Use of distributed ledger
technology H.7 DLT functionality description H.8 Audit H.9 Audit outcome Part I – Information on risks I.1 Offer-related risks I.2 Issuer-related risks I.3 Crypto-assets-related risks I.4 Project
implementation-related risks I.5 Technology-related risks I.6 Mitigation measures Part J – Information on the sustainability indicators in relation to
adverse impact on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts J.1 Adverse impacts on climate
and other environment-related adverse impacts |
|
||||||||||||||
|
01 |
Date of notification |
2025-11-07 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
02 |
Statement in accordance with
Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
This
crypto-asset white paper has not been approved by any competent authority in
any Member State of the European Union. The person seeking admission to
trading of the crypto-asset is solely responsible for the content of this
crypto-asset white paper. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
03 |
Compliance statement in
accordance with Article 6(6) of Regulation (EU)
2023/1114 |
This crypto-asset white paper complies with Title II of Regulation
(EU) |
|
||||||||||||||
|
04 |
Statement in accordance with Article 6(5),
points (a), (b), (c), of
Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
The crypto-asset referred to in this crypto-asset white paper may
lose its value
in part or in full,
may not always be transferable and may not be
liquid. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
05 |
Statement in accordance with
Article 6(5), point
(d), of Regulation (EU)
2023/1114 |
False |
|
||||||||||||||
|
06 |
Statement in accordance with
Article 6(5), points
(e) and (f), of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
The crypto-asset referred to in this white paper is not covered by the investor compensation schemes under Directive 97/9/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council or the deposit guarantee schemes under
Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
SUMMARY |
|||||||||||||||||
|
07 |
Warning in accordance with
Article 6(7), second subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
Warning This summary should
be read as an introduction to the crypto-asset
white paper. The prospective
holder should base any decision to purchase this crypto-asset on the content of the crypto-
asset white paper as a whole and not on the summary alone. The offer to the
public of this crypto-asset does not constitute an offer or solicitation to purchase financial instruments and any such
offer or solicitation can be made only by means of a prospectus or other
offer documents pursuant to the applicable national law. This
crypto-asset white paper does not constitute a prospectus as referred to in Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 of
the European Parliament and of the Council or any other offer document
pursuant to Union or national law. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
08 |
Characteristics of the crypto-asset |
The Magic Eden (“$ME”) token is a fungible digital token built
on the Solana blockchain, conforming to the SPL token standard. The $ME token
has no rights or obligations within ME Foundation. It does not grant
governance powers, enforceable claims, or guarantees of utility. The $ME token, is the native utility[1]
and governance token for the Magic Eden platform. Launched on December 10,
2024, $ME is designed to enhance user engagement and decentralise
decision-making within the platform. Key Characteristics of $ME: Total Supply and
Distribution: $ME has a capped total supply of
1 billion tokens. The distribution plan spans four years, with allocations as
follows: · Community Airdrop: 12.5% (125 million tokens) were allocated to reward
early adopters and active users. · Community and Ecosystem Development: 38.4% is reserved for
partnerships, incentives, and platform growth. · Contributors (Team, Advisors, Contractors): 25.5% is allocated to
Magic Eden's team and early supporters. · Strategic Participants: 23.6% is designated for investors and advisors
to support strategic partnerships. Utility and
Governance: · Transaction Medium: $ME can be used to pay for NFTs across multiple
blockchains supported by Magic Eden, streamlining the trading experience. · Staking Rewards: Holders have the option to stake $ME tokens to earn
additional rewards, encouraging long-term participation. · Governance Rights: Token holders can participate in governance
decisions, influencing the platform's future developments and policies. Market Performance: As of November 3, 2025 $ME is trading at approximately $0.40, with a
market capitalisation of around $66,852,359. The circulating supply is about 167,130,897 tokens, representing 16.7% of the total supply. The introduction of $ME reflects Magic Eden's commitment to decentralisation
and community involvement, providing users with both utility within the
platform and a voice in its governance. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
09 |
|
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
10 |
Key information about the offer
to the public or admission to trading |
Magic
Eden price today, ME to USD live price, marketcap and chart | CoinMarketCap As of 2025-11-03, the $ME token has a fully diluted valuation of
approximately USD$ 406,054,290 corresponding to its total supply of 1,000,000,000 $ME tokens. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Part
A - Information about the
offeror or the person seeking
admission to
trading |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
A.1 |
Name |
ME Foundation |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.2 |
Legal form |
Foundation |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.3 |
Registered address |
3119
9 Forum Lane, Camana Bay, P.O. Box 144, Grand Cayman KY1-9006, Cayman Islands |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.4 |
Head office |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.5 |
Registration date |
2023-12-06 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.6 |
Legal entity identifier |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.7 |
Another identifier required
pursuant to applicable national
law |
IC-405343 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.8 |
Contact telephone number |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.9 |
E-mail address |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
A.10 |
Response time (Days) |
20 days |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.11 |
Parent company |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.12 |
Members of the management body |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.13 |
Business activity |
The ME Foundation is a decentralised autonomous organisation (DAO)
that governs the $ME token ecosystem. It supports cross-chain trading,
minting, and wallet protocols used in platforms like Magic Eden. Token
holders participate in governance by proposing and voting on improvements and
funding grants to grow the ecosystem. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.14 |
Parent company business activity |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.15 |
Newly established |
true |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A.16 |
Financial condition for the past three
years |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
A.17 |
Financial condition since registration |
ME Foundation is an
early-stage organization. Since incorporation, operations have been funded by
private investments and token treasury resources, rather than revenue from
product sales. These funds have been used to finance operational expenses. As
a result, the entity has not posted traditional “profits” – expenditures have
been focused on building the network and community. Because the project
is not yet revenue-generating at scale, the financial condition is
essentially that of a funded start-up / community project: it has sufficient
runway (cash and token reserves) to continue operations for the near-to-mid
term, but it is not cash-flow positive. The key financial events since
inception include the token generation (which created the crypto-asset
treasury), allocations of tokens to ecosystem development, and ongoing
expenses for operations and community growth. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Part
B - Information about the issuer, if different
from the offeror or person
seeking admission to trading |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Part C- Information about the operator of the trading platform
in cases
where it draws up the crypto-asset
white paper and information about other persons
drawing the crypto-asset white paper pursuant
to Article 6(1), second subparagraph,
of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Not applicable |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Part
D- Information
about the crypto-asset project |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
D.1 |
Crypto-asset project
name |
Magic Eden ($ME) |
|
||||||||||||||
|
D.2 |
Crypto-assets name |
Magic Eden |
|
||||||||||||||
|
D.3 |
Abbreviation |
$ME |
|
||||||||||||||
|
D.4 |
Crypto-asset project
description |
The $ME token is issued on the Solana
blockchain. It does not grant governance rights or enforceable obligations
within the ME Foundation. $ME is an initiative led by the ME Foundation, a Cayman Foundation company
established to develop and maintain open-source infrastructure for
cross-chain digital asset trading. Its primary focus is on stewarding the
protocols that enable the seamless exchange of NFTs and fungible tokens
across different blockchain networks. The project supports the decentralisation of the Magic Eden platform,
a leading NFT marketplace, by introducing and managing the $ME token. This
token functions as a utility and governance asset within the ecosystem,
allowing holders to participate in platform governance, stake tokens for
rewards, and pay for transaction fees. ME Foundation aims to promote a more open and accessible digital
economy by supporting interoperability between blockchains, community-led
development, and transparent governance mechanisms. Further information is available here: https://mefoundation.com/ |
|
||||||||||||||
|
D.5 |
Details of all natural or legal persons involved in the implementation of the crypto-asset
project |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
D.6 |
Utility Token Classification |
False |
|
||||||||||||||
|
D.7 |
Key Features of Goods/Services for
Utility Token Projects |
The $ME token is the native token of the Magic Eden ecosystem,
designed to enhance user engagement and decentralise platform operations. Its
key features include: 1. Transaction Utility: $ME can be used to
pay for NFTs across multiple blockchains supported by Magic Eden,
streamlining the trading experience. 2. Staking Rewards: Holders have the
option to stake their $ME tokens to earn additional rewards. Staking not only
provides incentives but also unlocks participation in Magic Eden Quests,
where users can complete challenges to earn more $ME tokens. 3. Governance Participation: $ME holders
possess governance rights, enabling them to propose or vote on changes and
upgrades to Magic Eden's platform operations, fostering a community-driven
approach to development. 4. Cross-Chain Interoperability: The token facilitates seamless trading across various blockchain
networks, enhancing user experience in a multi-chain environment. These features collectively aim to create a more integrated,
user-centric, and decentralised platform within the Magic Eden ecosystem. The $ME token does not grant governance rights or enforceable
obligations within the ME Foundation. It serves as an incentive mechanism for
validator coordination, operator credentialing, and infrastructure growth,
aligning long-term incentives for staking ecosystem participants. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
D.8 |
Plans for the token |
The $ME token is integral to Magic Eden's strategy
for enhancing its platform and expanding its ecosystem. The key plans for the
token include: 1. Broadening Cross-Chain Capabilities: Magic Eden aims to support over 15 blockchain
networks by the end of 2025, facilitating seamless trading of NFTs and tokens
across multiple chains. 2. Implementing Comprehensive Rewards Programs: The platform plans to introduce extensive
on-chain trading rewards, allowing users to earn $ME tokens by actively
trading NFTs and tokens across supported blockchains. 3. Enhancing Community Governance: $ME holders will have governance rights,
enabling them to propose and vote on key platform developments and policies,
fostering a community-driven approach to Magic Eden's evolution. 4. Integrating with Third-Party Decentralised
Applications (dApps):
The ME Foundation intends to encourage third-party dApps to adopt the $ME
token, promoting interoperability and expanding its utility beyond the Magic
Eden platform. These initiatives underscore Magic Eden's commitment
to creating a decentralised, user-centric ecosystem that supports cross-chain
digital asset trading and community participation. All planned uses of $ME remain subject to market
conditions, regulatory compliance, and the evolving needs of the $ME-protocol
ecosystem and/or the ME Foundation. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
D.9 |
Resource allocation |
As detailed in the Initial
Transparency Report,
USD$1.4m was used to fund legal, DAO administrative and registration fees,
contractors and third parties since initial set up through launch. All planned uses of
$ME token remain subject to market conditions, regulatory compliance, and the
evolving needs of the $ME-protocol ecosystem and/or the ME Foundation. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
D.10 |
Planned use of collected funds or crypto-assets |
Not applicable, as this white paper was drawn up for
the admission to trading and not for collecting funds for the
crypto-asset-project. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Part
E - Information
about the offer
to the public
of crypto-assets or their
admission to
trading |
|||||||||||||||||
|
E.1 |
Public offering or admission to trading |
ATTR |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.2 |
Reasons for public offer or admission to trading |
The $ME token was
admitted to public trading for several strategic and practical reasons aimed
at supporting the growth of the Magic Eden ecosystem and the broader goals of
the ME Foundation. Key reasons include: 1. Decentralisation
of the Ecosystem · Public trading allows token ownership to be distributed across a broad
user base, reducing reliance on centralised stakeholders and empowering
community participation in governance. 2. Incentivising
Engagement · By listing the token publicly, users can earn and trade $ME through
airdrops, staking, and platform activity, creating a clear incentive
structure that rewards usage and loyalty. 3. Liquidity and
Market Access · Public trading provides liquidity, enabling users to freely buy and
sell $ME tokens. This is essential for the token to be practical as a medium
of exchange and a governance asset. 4. Wider Adoption and
Utility · Listing the token on exchanges broadens its exposure and
accessibility, encouraging integration with third-party dApps and increasing
its use across multiple blockchain networks. 5. Funding Ecosystem
Growth · Through token appreciation and market interest, the ME Foundation can
attract further resources to invest in protocol development, community
initiatives, and multi-chain expansion. 6. Transparency and
Trust · Public trading brings visibility to the project’s value and governance
model, fostering trust among users, developers, and potential partners. In summary, public
admission to trading was a strategic move to decentralise control, expand
community ownership, and provide the infrastructure needed for long-term
scalability and adoption. The primary goal is
to support the long-term sustainability and operational needs of the ME
Foundation by funding research and development, and ecosystem growth
initiatives. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.3 |
Fundraising target |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.4 |
Minimum subscription goals |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.5 |
Maximum subscription goals |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.6 |
Oversubscription acceptance |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.7 |
Oversubscription allocation |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.8 |
Issue price |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.9 |
Official currency or any other
crypto-assets determining the issue price |
Not applicable, as this white paper is written to support admission to
trading and not for the initial offer to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.10 |
Subscription fee |
Not applicable, as this white paper is written to support admission to
trading and not for the initial offer to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.11 |
Offer price determination method |
The offer price of the $ME token is typically determined based on a
combination of market conditions, project valuation, supply and demand,
investor sentiment, early-stage investor pricing, and the pricing of similar
projects in the market. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.12 |
Total number of offered/traded crypto-assets |
167,130,897 of the total number of 1,000,000,000 in circulation as of
2025-11-03. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.13 |
Targeted holders |
ALL |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.14 |
Holder restrictions |
There are currently no formal restrictions on who may hold or trade
$ME tokens enforced by the $ME token contract or community. However, access
may be restricted by exchange platforms or national laws. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.15 |
Reimbursement notice |
Not applicable, as this white paper is written to support admission to
trading and not for the initial offer to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.16 |
Refund mechanism |
Not applicable. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.17 |
Refund timeline |
Not applicable. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.18 |
Offer phases |
Not applicable. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.19 |
Early purchase discount |
Not applicable. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.20 |
Time-limited offer |
Not applicable. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.21 |
Subscription period beginning |
Not applicable, as this white paper is written to support admission to
trading and not for the initial offer to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.22 |
Subscription period
end |
Not applicable, as this white paper is written to support admission to
trading and not for the initial offer to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.23 |
Safeguarding
arrangements for offered funds/crypto- Assets |
Not applicable, as this white paper is written to support admission to
trading and not for the initial offer to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.24 |
Payment methods for crypto-asset purchase |
With respect to the admission to trading the payment methods are
subject to the respective capabilities of the Crypto Asset Service Provider
listing the crypto-asset. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.25 |
Value transfer methods for reimbursement |
Not applicable. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.26 |
Right of withdrawal |
Not applicable, as this white paper is written to support admission to
trading and not for the initial offer to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.27 |
Transfer of
purchased crypto-assets |
The transfer of
purchased crypto-assets are subject to the respective capabilities of the
Crypto Asset Service Provider listing the crypto-asset. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.28 |
Transfer time schedule |
Not applicable, as this white paper is written to support admission to
trading and not for the initial offer to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.29 |
Purchaser's technical requirements |
The technical
requirements that the purchaser is required to fulfil to hold the
crypto-assets of purchased crypto-assets are subject to the respective
capabilities of the Crypto Asset Service Provider listing the crypto-asset.
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.30 |
Crypto-asset service
provider (CASP) name |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.31 |
CASP identifier |
Not publicly available information |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.32 |
Placement form |
NTAV |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.33 |
Trading platforms name |
Trading
on relevant MiCAR-compliant trading platforms is sought, including: Binance Bitget HTX
(formerly Huobi) Coinbase KuCoin |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.34 |
Trading platforms Market identifier code (MIC) |
Binance:
BIN Bitget:
BITG HTX
(formerly Huobi): HTX Coinbase:
FREX KuCoin:
KUCN |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.35 |
Trading platforms access |
This depends on the
trading platform listing the crypto-asset. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.36 |
Involved costs |
This depends on the trading platform listing the crypto-asset.
Furthermore, costs may occur for making transfers out of the platform (i.e.
"transaction costs" for blockchain network use that may exceed the
value of the crypto-asset itself). |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.37 |
Offer expenses |
Not applicable, as this crypto-asset white paper concerns the
admission to trading and not the offer of the token to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.38 |
Conflicts of interest |
MiCA-compliant Crypto Asset Service Providers shall have strong
measurements in place in order to manage conflicts of interests. Due to the
broad audience this white-paper is addressing, potential investors should
always check the conflicts of interest policy of their respective
counterparty. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.39 |
Applicable law |
Not applicable, as
this crypto-asset white paper concerns the admission to trading and not the
offer of the token to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
E.40 |
Competent court |
Not applicable, as
this crypto-asset white paper concerns the admission to trading and not the
offer of the token to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Part
F - Information
about the
crypto-assets |
|||||||||||||||||
|
F.1 |
Crypto-asset type |
Other crypto-asset The crypto-asset described in the white paper is classified as a
crypto-asset under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) but does
not qualify as an electronic money token (EMT) or an asset-referenced token
(ART). The crypto-asset described in the white paper does also not qualify as
a utility token, as it is not only intended to provide access to a good or a
service supplied by its issuer. It is a digital representation of value that
can be stored and transferred using distributed ledger technology (DLT) or
similar technology. The crypto-asset does not aim to maintain a stable value by
referencing an official currency, a basket of assets, or any other underlying
rights. Instead, its valuation is entirely market-driven, based on supply and
demand dynamics, and not supported by a stabilization mechanism. It is
neither pegged to any fiat currency nor backed by any external assets,
distinguishing it clearly from EMTs and ARTs. Furthermore, the crypto-asset is not categorized as a financial
instrument, deposit, insurance product, pension product, or any other
regulated financial product under EU law. It does not grant financial rights,
voting rights, or any contractual claims to its holders, ensuring that it
remains outside the scope of regulatory frameworks applicable to traditional
financial instruments. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.2 |
Crypto-asset functionality |
See D.8 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.3 |
Planned application of functionalities |
See D.8. Timelines subject to change and development times. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
A description of the characteristics
of the crypto-asset,
including the data necessary for
classification of the
crypto-asset white paper in the
register referred to in Article
109 of
Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, as specified in accordance with paragraph 8 of that Article |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
F.4 |
Type of crypto-asset white
paper |
OTHR |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.5 |
The type of submission |
NEWT |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.6 |
Crypto-asset characteristics |
The $ME token is
built on the Solana blockchain, conforming to the SPL token standard Fixed supply of 1,000,000,000
$ME tokens (potential for the circulating supply to decrease via token
burning). |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.7 |
Commercial name or trading
name |
Magic Eden |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.8 |
Website of the issuer |
https://mefoundation.com/
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.9 |
Starting date of offer to the public or admission to trading |
2024-12-10 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.10 |
Publication date |
2025-12-05 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.11 |
Any other
services provided by the issuer |
The ME Foundation is
a Cayman Foundation company dedicated to supporting the development and
adoption of cross-chain protocols with community-led governance. Beyond
issuing the $ME token, the Foundation provides several key services: 1. Development of
Cross-Chain Protocols The ME Foundation
manages a suite of open-source protocols that facilitate the trading,
minting, and management of digital assets across multiple blockchain
networks. These protocols are designed to enable seamless interactions
between different chains, including Solana, Bitcoin, and Ethereum-compatible
networks. 2. Governance and
Community Engagement The Foundation
oversees the decentralisation and stewardship of these protocols, ensuring
that they are governed in a community-driven manner. This involves
facilitating decision-making processes where $ME token holders can
participate in shaping the future development and adoption of the protocols. 3. Support for
Decentralised Applications (dApps) By providing robust
cross-chain protocols, the ME Foundation enables decentralised applications
to operate efficiently across various blockchain networks. Magic Eden, a
leading NFT marketplace, is one such platform that has adopted the $ME token
as its ecosystem token, leveraging these protocols to offer users a seamless
multi-chain experience. Through these
services, the ME Foundation aims to foster a more interconnected and
user-centric blockchain ecosystem, promoting the seamless exchange and
management of digital assets across diverse platforms. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.12 |
Language or languages of the crypto-asset
white paper |
English |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.13 |
Digital token identifier code used to uniquely identify the crypto-asset or each of the several crypto assets to which
the white paper relates, where available |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.14 |
Functionally fungible group
digital token identifier, where available |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.15 |
Voluntary data flag |
Not applicable, as this white paper is written to support admission to
trading and not for the initial offer to the public. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.16 |
Personal data flag |
true |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.17 |
LEI eligibility |
true |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.18 |
Home Member State |
Ireland |
|
||||||||||||||
|
F.19 |
Host Member States |
Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark,
Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia,
Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania,
Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Iceland, Lichtenstein and Norway. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Part G
- Information on the
rights and obligations attached
to the
crypto-assets |
|||||||||||||||||
|
G.1 |
Purchaser rights and obligations |
Purchasers of the $ME token do not acquire any governance rights or
enforceable obligations in the ME Foundation. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.2 |
Exercise of rights and obligations |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.3 |
Conditions for modifications of rights and obligations |
The rights and obligations of the $ME token holders may be modified
under certain conditions as determined by the ME Foundation in accordance
with the ME Foundation’s governance and operational needs. Any changes will
be communicated to purchasers in a transparent manner. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.4 |
Future public offers |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.5 |
Issuer retained crypto-assets |
0 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.6 |
Utility token classification |
False |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.7 |
Key features of goods/services of utility tokens |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.8 |
Utility tokens redemption |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.9 |
Non-trading request |
true |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.10 |
Crypto-assets purchase or sale modalities |
Not applicable, as
the admission to trading of the tokens is sought. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.11 |
Crypto-assets transfer restrictions |
There are no specific transfer restrictions at the token level for $ME
tokens. The token is fully transferable across supported blockchain networks
(such as Solana, Ethereum-compatible chains, and Bitcoin), and holders can
freely send or receive it between compatible wallets. However, $ME tokens may
be subject to certain transfer limitations imposed by trading platforms to
comply with legal, regulatory, and operational obligations. These measures
are designed to ensure compliance with applicable anti-money laundering
(AML), know-your-customer (KYC), and sanctions-related regulations. Jurisdictional Restrictions $ME tokens must not
be transferred or sold to individuals or entities located in jurisdictions
subject to international sanctions, or where the transfer, holding, or
trading of crypto assets is restricted by local laws or regulatory
frameworks. It is the responsibility of the user to ensure that their
activities involving $ME tokens comply with the laws applicable in their
jurisdiction. Exchange-Imposed Restrictions Transfers of $ME
tokens may be restricted or blocked when conducted via centralised exchanges
if a purchaser or sender has not completed identity verification in
accordance with the exchange’s AML and KYC procedures. In such cases,
transactions involving unverified users may be limited, delayed, or reversed
to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing
(CTF) laws and exchange policies. Decentralised Transfers On decentralised
exchanges (DEXs), such as Uniswap or Jupiter, peer-to-peer transfers of $ME
are generally unrestricted at the protocol level. However, users are
individually responsible for ensuring their compliance with all relevant
legal and regulatory requirements when transacting on such platforms. These transfer restrictions are designed to protect both the
purchasers and the broader ecosystem, ensuring that the $ME token remains
compliant with legal obligations and functions securely within its intended
use. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.12 |
Supply adjustment protocols |
false |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.13 |
Supply adjustment mechanisms |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.14 |
Token value protection schemes |
false |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.15 |
Token value protection schemes description |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.16 |
Compensation schemes |
false |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.17 |
Compensation
schemes description |
Not applicable |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.18 |
Applicable law |
Subject to mandatory
applicable law, any dispute arising out of or in connection with this white
paper and all claims in connection with the $ME token shall be exclusively,
including the validity, invalidity, breach or termination thereof, subject to
the jurisdiction of the courts in the Cayman Islands. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
G.19 |
Competent court |
Subject to mandatory
applicable law, any dispute arising out of or in connection with this white
paper and all claims in connection with the $ME token shall be exclusively,
including the validity, invalidity, breach or termination thereof, subject to
the jurisdiction of the courts in the Cayman Islands. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Part
H –
information on the underlying technology |
|||||||||||||||||
|
H.1 |
Distributed ledger
technology (DTL) |
Distributed Ledger
Technology ("DLT") refers to a digital system for recording
transactions in which the transactions and their details are recorded in
multiple places at the same time. Unlike traditional databases, distributed
ledgers have no central data store or administration functionality. Instead,
the ledger is decentralized, and consensus on the transactions is achieved
through a process that involves multiple nodes, each maintaining its own copy
of the ledger. The benefits of DLT include increased transparency, enhanced
security, improved traceability, and greater efficiency of transactions. One of the most
well-known forms of DLT is a blockchain, which is a subtype characterized by
its use of a chain of blocks to manage the ledger. Each block contains a list
of transactions and is cryptographically linked to the previous block,
ensuring that the data once recorded, cannot be altered retroactively without
altering all subsequent blocks. Blockchains also
introduce features like smart contracts, notably to automate and enforce
pre-defined transactions and logic through code, thereby reducing the need
for intermediaries and further boosting efficiency. Blockchains offer
significant benefits for consumer choice and interoperability as well.
Consumers have the advantage of accessing the open-source code of these
blockchains, allowing them to review, verify, and select the platform that
best suits their needs. This transparency empowers users to make more
informed decisions. Additionally, the open nature of blockchains promotes
interoperability, meaning that any type of application that follows the same
technical standards can integrate with the blockchain without anyone’s
permission. This flexibility enables a wide range of applications to work
seamlessly together, fostering innovation and making it easier for different
services to connect and interact within the blockchain ecosystem. ME Foundation issues
the $ME tokens on the Solana blockchain in order to leverage these benefits. The $ME token is a
Solana SPL token. The use of DLT enables decentralised ownership,
transparency, and auditability of token transactions and smart contract
interactions. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
H.2 |
Protocols and technical standards |
ME Foundation
will support $ME tokens on the Solana blockchain. ME Foundation
does not have any ability or obligation to prevent or mitigate attacks or
resolve any other issues that might arise with any $ME token supported
blockchain. . |
|
||||||||||||||
|
H.3 |
Technology used |
· The $ME token uses the existing SPL Token Program standard on Solana. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
H.4 |
Consensus mechanism |
Blockchains rely on consensus mechanisms to ensure their decentralized
network of nodes can reach agreement around transaction validity and
ordering. Solana relies Proof of History (PoH) combined with Proof of Stake
(PoS) consensus, which requires that validators stake the native token (e.g.
ETH) as collateral in order to qualify as a validator. Validators are
selected for consensus based on the proportion of tokens they have staked,
and in some cases can lose some of the staked token if they have been shown
to sign invalid transactions. $ME does not implement its own consensus but inherits the security
assumptions and transaction finality of the underlying networks. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
H.5 |
Incentive mechanisms and applicable fees |
The Solana
blockchain on which the $ME token is issued has developed its own incentive
mechanisms and request fees to realize transactions. Please refer to the
Solana website for more details on the mechanisms in place. The $ME token
is designed to incentivise participation in the Magic Eden ecosystem through: · Staking rewards: Users can stake $ME to earn yield and access benefits · Quest participation: Tokens can be earned by completing on-platform
activities · Governance participation: Token holders may propose and vote on
ecosystem decisions · Fee discounts: $ME can be used to purchase NFTs within supported
platforms ·
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
H.6 |
Use of distributed ledger
technology |
false |
|
||||||||||||||
|
H.7 |
DLT functionality description |
Not applicable
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
H.8 |
Audit |
As we are
understanding the question relating to "technology" to be
interpreted in a broad sense, the answer to whether an audit of "the
technology used" was conducted is "no”, we cannot guarantee, that
all parts of the technology used have been audited. This is due to the fact
this report focusses on risk, and we cannot guarantee that each part of the
technology used was audited. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
H.9 |
Audit outcome |
Not applicable. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Part I – Information on risks |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
I.1 |
Offer-related risks |
The offering and trading of $ME tokens involve various risks common to
the broader crypto-asset market, particularly in cross-chain ecosystems, NFT
marketplaces, and multi-chain token applications. Market Volatility The price of $ME
tokens may fluctuate significantly due to market sentiment, cross-chain
trading dynamics, ecosystem participation, or broader economic and regulatory
developments. Such volatility could result in financial loss for token
holders or traders. Liquidity Risk There is no
guarantee that $ME will maintain high trading volume or deep liquidity.
Market depth may be influenced by exchange availability, staking patterns, or
shifts in platform demand, which could affect the ability to buy or sell $ME
at desired prices. Regulatory Risk The regulatory
environment for crypto assets, especially those related to decentralised
ecosystems like Magic Eden, is rapidly evolving. Future regulatory actions
may affect staking, token utility, or cross-chain functionalities, impacting
the usage or legality of the $ME token in certain jurisdictions. AML/KYC Compliance Accessing $ME
through centralised exchanges or fiat on-ramps typically requires compliance
with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) procedures.
Failure to meet these obligations may result in restricted access or service
limitations, subject to the laws of the user's jurisdiction. Market Manipulation Like other publicly
traded tokens, $ME may be exposed to manipulative behaviours such as wash
trading, pump-and-dump schemes, or excessive speculation. These practices can
distort pricing and create artificial volatility. Operational Risk Technical
disruptions, smart contract vulnerabilities, or performance issues with
exchanges or blockchain networks could delay or prevent token transfers,
staking activities, or cross-chain interactions. Downtime or software bugs
may also pose risks to token security and user confidence. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
I.2 |
Issuer-related risks |
Issuer and Governance $ME is issued
by the ME Foundation, a Cayman foundation company supporting open-source,
cross-chain protocols. While the Foundation maintains stewardship of the
ecosystem, it is not a regulated financial institution. Governance is
community-driven and subject to the effectiveness of decentralised
coordination. Decentralised Coordination The progress of the ME ecosystem depends on coordination between
contributors, developers, token holders, validators, and ecosystem partners.
Disruptions to this collaboration—such as contributor departure or governance
stagnation—could hinder technical development and token utility. Brand and Ecosystem Dependency The value of $ME is closely linked to the adoption and reputation of
Magic Eden. A decline in platform usage, reputational issues, or competition
from superior NFT and trading platforms could negatively affect the token’s
utility and demand. Regulatory Uncertainty The ME
Foundation and Magic Eden operate globally and may face legal challenges or
evolving compliance obligations. Regulatory changes related to NFT trading,
token issuance, or cross-chain activity could impact the platform and its
users. Insolvency As with every other
commercial endeavor, the risk of insolvency of the issuer is given. This
could be caused by but is not limited to lack of interest from the public,
lack of funding, incapacitation of key developers and project members, force
majeure (including pandemics and wars) or lack of commercial success or
prospects. Legal and Regulatory Compliance
Cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based technologies are subject to evolving
regulatory landscapes worldwide. Regulations vary across jurisdictions and
may be subject to significant changes. Non-compliance can result in
investigations, enforcement actions, penalties, fines, sanctions, or the
prohibition of the trading of the crypto-asset impacting its viability and
market acceptance. This could also result in the issuer to be subject to
private litigation. The beforementioned would most likely also lead to
changes with respect to trading of the crypto-asset that may negatively
impact on the value, legality, or functionality of the crypto-asset. Operational Failure to develop or
maintain effective internal control, or any difficulties encountered in the
implementation of such controls, or their improvement could harm the issuer's
business, causing disruptions, financial losses, or reputational damage. Industry The issuer is and
will be subject to all of the risks and uncertainties associated with a
memecoin-project, where the token issued has zero intrinsic value. History
has shown that most of this projects resulted in financial losses for the
investors and were only set up to enrich a few insiders with the money from
retail investors. Competition There are numerous
other crypto-asset projects in the same realm, which could have an effect on
the crypto-asset in question. Unanticipated Risk In addition to the
risks included in this section, there might be other risks that cannot be
foreseen. Additional risks may also materialize as unanticipated variations
or combinations of the risks discussed. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
I.3 |
Crypto-assets-related risks |
Speculative Nature $ME is a utility and
governance token that derives its value from user engagement, ecosystem
functionality, and trading activity. It is a speculative asset and may not
reflect intrinsic value or technical progress. Blockchain Dependency $ME operates
on the Solana blockchain. All blockchains, including Solana, present distinct
risks, including: · Network congestion · Elevated transaction fees · Smart contract bugs · Forks or protocol upgrades Future Use Cases While $ME is
currently used for governance, staking, rewards, and purchasing NFTs within
Magic Eden, future use cases are not guaranteed. Additional utility may
depend on community proposals, partnerships, and regulatory clarity. Market Volatility Crypto-asset prices
are highly susceptible to dramatic fluctuations influenced by various
factors, including market sentiment, regulatory changes, technological
advancements, and macroeconomic conditions. These fluctuations can result in
significant financial losses within short periods, making the market highly
unpredictable and challenging for investors. This is especially true for
crypto-assets without any intrinsic value, and investors should be prepared
to lose the complete amount of money invested in the respective
crypto-assets. Liquidity Challenges Some
crypto-assets suffer from limited liquidity, which can present difficulties
when executing large trades without significantly impacting market prices.
This lack of liquidity can lead to substantial financial losses, particularly
during periods of rapid market movements, when selling assets may become
challenging or require accepting unfavourable prices. Asset Security Crypto-assets face
unique security threats, including the risk of theft from exchanges or
digital wallets, loss of private keys, and potential failures of custodial
services. Since crypto transactions are generally irreversible, a security
breach or mismanagement can result in the permanent loss of assets,
emphasizing the importance of strong security measures and practices. Scams The irrevocability of
transactions executed using blockchain infrastructure, as well as the
pseudonymous nature of blockchain ecosystems, attracts scammers. Therefore,
investors in crypto-assets must proceed with a high degree of caution when
investing in if they invest in crypto-assets. Typical scams include – but are
not limited to – the creation of fake crypto-assets with the same name,
phishing on social networks or by email, fake giveaways/airdrops, identity
theft, among others. Privacy Concerns All transactions on
the blockchain are permanently recorded and publicly accessible, which can
potentially expose user activities. Although addresses are pseudonymous, the
transparent and immutable nature of blockchain allows for advanced forensic
analysis and intelligence gathering. This level of transparency can make it
possible to link blockchain addresses to real-world identities over time,
compromising user privacy. Regulatory Uncertainty The regulatory
environment surrounding crypto-assets is constantly evolving, which can
directly impact their usage, valuation, and legal status. Changes in
regulatory frameworks may introduce new requirements related to consumer
protection, taxation, and anti-money laundering compliance, creating
uncertainty and potential challenges for investors and businesses operating
in the crypto space. Although the crypto-asset do not create or confer any
contractual or other obligations on any party, certain regulators may
nevertheless qualify the crypto-asset as a security or other financial
instrument under their applicable law, which in turn would have drastic
consequences for the crypto-asset, including the potential loss of the
invested capital in the asset. Furthermore, this could lead to the sellers and its affiliates,
directors, and officers being obliged to pay fines, including federal civil
and criminal penalties, or make the crypto-asset illegal or impossible to
use, buy, or sell in certain jurisdictions. On top of that, regulators could
take action against the issuer as well as the trading platforms if the
regulators view the token as an unregistered offering of securities or the
operations otherwise as a violation of existing law. Any of these outcomes would
negatively affect the value and/or functionality of the crypto-asset and/or
could cause a complete loss of funds of the invested money in the
crypto-asset for the investor. Counterparty risk Engaging in
agreements or storing crypto-assets on exchanges introduces counterparty
risks, including the failure of the other party to fulfill their obligations.
Investors may face potential losses due to factors such as insolvency,
regulatory non-compliance, or fraudulent activities by counterparties,
highlighting the need for careful due diligence when engaging with third
parties. Reputational concerns Crypto-assets
are often subject to reputational risks stemming from associations with
illegal activities, high-profile security breaches, and technological
failures. Such incidents can undermine trust in the broader ecosystem,
negatively affecting investor confidence and market value, thereby hindering
widespread adoption and acceptance. Technological Innovation New
technologies or platforms could render $ME token's design less competitive or
even break fundamental parts (i.e., quantum computing might break
cryptographic algorithms used to secure the network), impacting adoption and
value. Participants should approach the crypto-asset with a clear
understanding of its speculative and volatile nature and be prepared to
accept these risks and bear potential losses, which could include the
complete loss of the assets’ value. Community and Narrative As the
crypto-asset has no intrinsic value, all trading activity is based on the
intended market value is heavily dependent on its community and the
popularity of the memecoin narrative. Declining interest or negative
sentiment could significantly impact the token’s value. Interest Rate Change Historically,
changes in interest, foreign exchange rates, and increases in volatility have
increased credit and market risks and may also affect the value of the
crypto-asset. Although historic data does not predict the future, potential
investors should be aware that general movements in local and other factors
may affect the market, and this could also affect market sentiment and,
therefore most likely also the price of the crypto-asset. Taxation The taxation regime
that applies to the trading of the crypto-asset by individual holders or
legal entities will depend on the holder’s jurisdiction. It is the holder’s
sole responsibility to comply with all applicable tax laws, including, but
not limited to, the reporting and payment of income tax, wealth tax, or
similar taxes arising in connection with the appreciation and depreciation of
the crypto-asset. Anti-Money Laundering/Counter-Terrorism Financing It cannot be ruled out that crypto-asset wallet addresses interacting
with the crypto-asset have been, or will be used for money laundering or
terrorist financing purposes, or are identified with a person known to have
committed such offenses. Market Abuse It is noteworthy that
crypto-assets are potentially prone to increased market abuse risks, as the
underlying infrastructure could be used to exploit arbitrage opportunities
through schemes such as front-running, spoofing, pump-and-dump, and fraud
across different systems, platforms, or geographic locations. This is
especially true for crypto-assets with a low market capitalization and few
trading venues, and potential investors should be aware that this could lead
to a total loss of the funds invested in the crypto-asset. Timeline and Milestones Critical
project milestones could be delayed by technical, operational, or market
challenges. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
I.4 |
Project implementation-related risks |
As this white paper relates to the "admission to trading" of
the crypto-asset, the implementation risk is referring to the risks on the
Crypto Asset Service Providers side. These can be, but are not limited to,
typical project management risks, such as key-personal-risks, timeline-risks,
and technical implementation-risks. Additional risks may include: Technical Limitations Upgrades and
integrations may face delays or failure due to engineering challenges, bugs,
or resource limitations. These could slow down the scaling and functionality
of the ME ecosystem. Regulatory Developments Ongoing
regulatory scrutiny may require changes to the ecosystem's design, limit
accessibility in certain jurisdictions, or affect staking and cross-chain
functionality. Third-Party Reliance The ecosystem relies
on wallet providers, cross-chain bridges, and third-party platforms.
Technical failures or conflicts of interest with these partners may disrupt
$ME functionality. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
I.5 |
Technology-related risks |
As this white paper relates to the "admission to trading" of
the crypto-asset, the technology-related risks mainly lie in the settling on
the $ME-Protocol. Blockchain Dependency Risks $ME-Protocol Downtime: Potential outages or congestion of the
$ME-Protocol could interrupt on-chain token transfers, trading, and other
functions. Private Key Management: Token holders must securely manage their
private keys and recovery phrases to prevent permanent loss of access to
their tokens, which includes trading-venues, who are a prominent target for
dedicated hacks. Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Despite code audits and community
testing, smart contracts used by the ME ecosystem may contain undiscovered
bugs. Exploits could lead to token loss, operational errors, or ecosystem
disruption. Network Security Risks Attack Risks: The $ME-Protocol may face threats such as
denial-of-service (DoS) attacks or exploits targeting its consensus
mechanism, which could compromise network integrity. Network Disruptions: Reliance on Solana and other blockchains
introduces exposure to delays or downtime in: · Token transfers · Quest and staking participation · Cross-chain activity Evolving Technology Risks Technological Obsolescence: The fast pace of innovation in blockchain
technology may make $ME less competitive or become outdated, potentially
impacting the usability or adoption of the token. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
I.6 |
Mitigation measures |
Not applicable. |
|
||||||||||||||
|
Part J – Information on the sustainability indicators in relation to adverse impact
on the climate and other environment-related adverse
impacts |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
J.1 |
Adverse impacts on climate and other environment- related adverse
impacts |
Low Environmental Impact $ME operates on Solana which uses Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus
mechanisms. These consume far less energy than Proof of Work (PoW) systems,
leading to a comparatively low environmental footprint. Environmental Policy Status The ME Foundation has not published a formal environmental policy.
However, by leveraging PoS-based blockchains, it benefits from a reduced
energy profile without directly engaging in carbon offsetting or
environmental programmes. |
|
||||||||||||||
[1] While the $ME token provides utility within the ecosystem, it does not constitute a utility token under Article 3(1)(8) of MiCA, as its access rights are not contractually guaranteed nor tied to specific, identifiable goods or services.